#ISO 17025 2017 CHANGES FROM 2015 ISO#

How can I execute the Identification of risks to impartiality on an on-going basis?ģ. Once Identified, How can I perform evaluation or analysis?ģ. When I was reading the standard, it seems that impartiality is easy to understand and implement, but once it is needed to be documented for a procedure, the challenge is now presenting itself.ġ.How can I identify the Risks to impartiality?Ģ.

One more thing that overwhelmed me is the statement, “Ongoing basis”. When I started to create my process or procedure, I was stuck on what next to be done. More so when I read the term “ Risk Assessment“ for the identified Risk to Impartiality. Just like many others, before I started to understand and create my own procedure, I have a hard time understanding the requirements of the standard.Įven though this subject about impartiality is not new (yes it is), which is already in the old version, Still, once it was presented in the new version with a separate clause, it was like it is my first time being exposed to it.

There is also a question like, “Is it Mandatory to have a procedure for impartiality?”

#ISO 17025 2017 CHANGES FROM 2015 ISO#

Since the transition from the 2005 version to the 2017 version has started, I have received a number of comments regarding the ISO 17025 Impartiality procedure.

Iso 17025 2017 changes from 2015